<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Helpful Overview of the SBC&#8230;Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baptistmessenger.com/a-helpful-overview-of-the-sbc-yesterday-today-and-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baptistmessenger.com/a-helpful-overview-of-the-sbc-yesterday-today-and-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>A Ministry of the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Zalaznik</title>
		<link>http://baptistmessenger.com/a-helpful-overview-of-the-sbc-yesterday-today-and-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Zalaznik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baptistmessenger.com/?p=4529#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>This is the best synopsis I have read of the SBC. As one who did not grow up Southern Baptist but is a product of an SBC seminary I can attest to its validity. Although I consider myself quite loyal to the denomination, I do believe theology has taken a backseat to pragmatism and economic principles in key areas, leaving... many unreached in its bureacratic blindspots. I pray the GCRTF will bring light (and resources) to those areas.  My thoughts on one of those areas: http://wp.me/pqn1O-2k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best synopsis I have read of the SBC. As one who did not grow up Southern Baptist but is a product of an SBC seminary I can attest to its validity. Although I consider myself quite loyal to the denomination, I do believe theology has taken a backseat to pragmatism and economic principles in key areas, leaving&#8230; many unreached in its bureacratic blindspots. I pray the GCRTF will bring light (and resources) to those areas.  My thoughts on one of those areas: <a href="http://wp.me/pqn1O-2k" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pqn1O-2k</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

